Integrating Debate into Macroeconomics: A New Approach to eAssessments
As teachers, we must always be
looking for new and creative ways to evaluate our students' learning. I have
chosen to use debate as an eAssessment in my EC201: Intermediate Macroeconomics
course. The area of macroeconomics is substantial and complex, with a multitude
of theories and viewpoints that frequently call for more in-depth investigation
and debate. Debates, in my opinion, are effective for encouraging students to
express their understanding of the subject.
Webex, which is integrated with the
USP Moodle platform, will be used to facilitate the debates. Students will work
in groups of three for two weeks to prepare and do their research on the topics
allocated to them. On the day of the debate, each team will make their case,
refute the other team, and answer audience questions. In order to ensure a
clear and orderly discussion, the debate will be arranged with time limitations
for opening speeches, presentations, and conclusions.
I'm using this approach in part to
deter students from relying too much on AI technologies for their assignments.
While AI can be useful for brainstorming or research, the debate format allows
students to be quick thinkers and share their knowledge in real time. They will
have to participate in a real-time, interactive conversation and will not have
time to rely on responses produced by AI. Furthermore, the debate develops
critical thinking and public speaking abilities, which are crucial in both the
academic and professional environments.
Overall, I am eager to observe how
this debate eAssessment will motivate students to delve deeper into the subject
matter and cultivate critical abilities for their future professions. This
method, in my opinion, will better prepare students for the difficulties they
will encounter in the workplace.
Comments
Post a Comment